Editorial Policy

Astrozent's learn section exists to make classical Vedic astrology clear, accurate, and genuinely useful — without the hype. This page explains how we research, write, and review what you read here.

How we create our content

Our articles are produced with a combination of AI-assisted research and human editorial review. We use modern AI tools to gather and draft material, always grounded in classical Jyotish sources — including the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra, Saravali, and Phaladeepika — alongside established sidereal-astrology references. AI helps us work faster; it does not have the final say.

Human review

Every article is reviewed and edited by Ankita Sinha before it is published. She checks each piece for accuracy, clarity, and faithfulness to the tradition, and is responsible for what appears under her byline. Ankita is an editorial writer and reviewer, not a practicing astrologer — her role is to make sure what you read is well-sourced, readable, and honest.

Sourcing and accuracy

We cite classical texts where a claim comes from them, and we distinguish clearly between classical interpretations and modern readings. We do not invent dates, planetary positions, or scriptural references. Where astrology offers more than one view, we say so rather than presenting a single answer as settled fact.

What astrology can and can't do

Astrology, as we present it, is for reflection and guidance. It is not a substitute for professional medical, legal, financial, or psychological advice. Nothing on this site should be used to make decisions that need a qualified professional. Outcomes are never guaranteed.

Corrections

If you spot an error, tell us at support@astrozent.com and we'll review and correct it. We update the "last updated" date when we make a substantive change.